“SHOW YOUR WORK”: Follow up

So I finished the book my previous blog post: Show Your Work! by Austin Kleon. It’s a quick read, but there are a lot of ideas to unpack in this little book.

There’s a concept in this book that I actually initially struggled with when putting my work and thoughts online: to always question your online offerings with a “So What?” I’ve never found my thoughts, ideas so far as groundbreaking or out of the ordinary ENOUGH to warrant housing them somewhere on the internet (other than my portfolio website of course, which is full of work I’m proud of), so why push them out for the world to see? I eventually realized that this was limiting my creativity and thought processes; if you don’t get your work out there, even unfinished, there’s no way to discuss it and get better. And a blog easily allows you to reflect and see where you came from.

This concept, something that should have stuck with me from school and made so much sense in the classroom did not translate to online presence for me, and I’m guessing it’s because there’s so much finished work and talented, experienced people on the internet that most (or at least I) can’t help but feel small and unimportant sometimes. “Yelling into the void,” as it were. But hey, I have to look at this as “carving my space out” on the internet, another concept Austin discusses in this book.

I may add to this post as I consider the book further. It’s definitely worth a read!


Let’s Go

Best time to get some actual reading done: on the plane. I’m sure I’m not the only one who is upset that WiFi is quickly becoming expected on flights. The one last bastion of a relatively distraction-free zone (aside from a upset baby) is slowly disappearing from the skies.

Anyway! I’ve had this book for a while, but as I was letting a creative friend go through my library of design books last night I grabbed this for the flight. My JavaScript book will only keep me so entertained, hah. I cracked it in the airport (having arrived 2 hours early for no apparent reason), and immediately came upon a Dan Harmon quote (of Community and Rick & Morty fame).

Excited to get to Atlanta! I’ll be visiting my sister who moved there a couple of years ago, and we’ll be checking out the eclipse (she’s 2 hours from the TOTALITY; sounds so ominous).

Musings: Music Taste Being A Deal Breaker

FYI: This post has nothing to do (even tangentially) with design. Scroll on down past this wall o’ text.

I may be preaching to the choir, here. Graphic designers as a group are some of the most opinionated people I know concerning music. I have some (admittedly, probably common) theories as to why that is, but that would take up a whole ‘nother blog post.

The debate is this. Should differing tastes in music be a deal breaker in a blossoming relationship?

Today while perusing my Facebook feed, NPR posted the article that got me thinking on this subject (not for the first time). Here is the article in question. Now, I can never resist good, polarizing topics such as these. And even better is the comments section (which usually goes for a good half-hour in a frothy frenzy, then slows down). It was vedy intedesting to see the reactions of NPR’s generally music-savvy followers.

The conclusion that I’ve come to, over my EXTENSIVE 5 years (or so) of dating and relationship experience, is that it can (and should) vary by person, like any other preference in a preferred partner. Many people were stating it was, indeed, a deal breaker. Others were taking issue with this, expressing that such a snap judgement was shallow and superficial, and that other traits were much more important. Still others were very aptly pointing out that this was a “first world problem.” I can agree with that, but still think it can warrant discussion.

Concerts, car rides… music comes up. And I felt the need to point out that it’s not indifference to their taste (say for example, dubstep doesn’t bother you, you could take it or leave it), it’s actively HATING the music they enjoy (for example, commonly polarizing genres like pop, heavy metal, rap or country. Or dubstep.).

If music is very important to you, it’s one of those things you DO care about in a relationship. If music is not so important, then groovy! Terrible pun intended.

Is disliking someone because of the genre of books they read considered shallow, if reading is an important hobby for you? Say, vampire romances, to choose another polarizing (sub) genre. How about grooming and style choices? What if they dress very scantily, and you’re not into that? Say their sense of humor is extremely crude, and you have a more “refined” sense of humor? Or vice versa?

And to approach it from the other side: to you, music is not of much import. Discovering new music is the job of the radio. Top 40 is cool with you. And you start dating someone that insists that you come to concerts with them, you give their favorite band one more listen, they endlessly talk about how they loved a band far before they achieved fame, they make fun of you for your “pedestrian tastes,” (I’m sure we’ve all encountered someone like this in real life or on the internet, dear reader, no matter how varied and eclectic your tastes may be). I could see that destroying a relationship.

I suppose it’s all about extremes.

Music taste in general is one of those things that people automatically label as snobby in general (I’ve avoided the word hipster this entire post, but there you go, I said it)… therefore if it’s something one looks for in a partner, it can be seen as shallow. But we all look for certain surface-level traits in potential partners whether people acknowledge it or not. And yeah, maybe these judgments are all superficial, but those things matter a lot when at least initially looking for a mate. Looking for common ground is what we all do when getting to know someone.

TL;DR Do what you want!

As for my personal take on this… I would like my hypothetical boyfriend to enjoy similar music to my tastes, but I have other interests, so no. Not a deal breaker for me personally.

Musings: Hashtags on Facebook

i.chzbgrI posted this image today on Facebook, and it sparked an interesting (at least to me!) conversation with a CS friend of mine. I decided to post some of the conversation here.

It seems it’s only a matter of time before Facebook implements hashtags, but I’m holding out until it’s an actual feature. My friend Robert disagrees.

“Interestingly enough, hashtags had no power on twitter either. Originally the @ had no power on twitter. Both were organic language constructs which spread throughout the Twitter ecosystem, and were ubiquitous long before Twitter added a single line of code which made use of either of them.”

“I mean, when you get down to it, that’s what hashtags on Facebook are usually utilized for since we don’t have a character limit. Getting the most data across in the least amount of time. Even making jokes; you’re trying to get it down to a small amount of words instead of setting it up in a sentence.

But then again, you saying they originally didn’t do anything on Twitter, and then they made it happen… implying continued use on here could make developers create a functionality on here… okay.”

Well, it was really more implying the the functionality is secondary to the language. The @ is still used everywhere on the web to respond to someone in a non-threaded conversation. I’m just saying that these conventions can be apart of language without aiding implementation.”

Evolving meanings and code functions aside, in the case of @, it makes sense since the ampersat symbol literally means “at,” and has the added benefit of not cluttering up a post with quote trees. The hashtag/pound key symbol at its most basic (at least now) means ‘number'” not “‘subject/topic.'”

“However, at it’s origin it means pound. As in a pound of sugar. As in, let’s draw a line through ℔ so it doesn’t make the L look like a 1. Isn’t it interesting that the symbol you associate so strongly with signifying numbers was originally created to signify that something WAS NOT a number? Who is to say that the evolution of this mark has stopped here?”

“How is a unit of weight not a number? They’re at least related to each other; not just an otherwise uncommonly used symbol that was chosen to represent a completely different idea.”

Here’s a link to the wiki page for further reading on the origin of the hashtag.